*The tutorial explains the basics of correlation in Excel, shows how to calculate a correlation coefficient, build a correlation matrix and interpret the results. *

One of the simplest statistical calculations that you can do in Excel is correlation. Though simple, it is very useful in understanding the relations between two or more variables. Microsoft Excel provides all the necessary tools to run correlation analysis, you just need to know how to use them.

**Correlation** is a measure that describes the strength and direction of a relationship between two variables. It is commonly used in statistics, economics and social sciences for budgets, business plans and the like.

The method used to study how closely the variables are related is called **correlation analysis**.

Here are a couple of examples of strong correlation:

- The number of calories you eat and your weight (positive correlation)
- The temperature outside and your heating bills (negative correlation)

And here the examples of data that have weak or no correlation:

- Your cat's name and their favorite food
- The color of your eyes and your height

An essential thing to understand about correlation is that it only shows how closely related two variables are. Correlation, however, does not imply causation. The fact that changes in one variable are associated with changes in the other variable does not mean that one variable actually causes the other to change.

If you're interested to learn causality and make predictions, take a step forward and perform linear regression analysis.

The numerical measure of the degree of association between two continuous variables is called the **correlation coefficient **(r).

The coefficient value is always between -1 and 1 and it measures both the strength and direction of the linear relationship between the variables.

The larger the absolute value of the coefficient, the stronger the relationship:

- The extreme values of -1 and 1 indicate a perfect linear relationship when all the data points fall on a line. In practice, a perfect correlation, either positive or negative, is rarely observed.
- A coefficient of 0 indicates no linear relationship between the variables. This is what you are likely to get with two sets of random numbers.
- Values between 0 and +1/-1 represent a scale of weak, moderate and strong relationships. As
*r*gets closer to either -1 or 1, the strength of the relationship increases.

The coefficient sign (plus or minus) indicates the direction of the relationship.

**Positive**coefficients represent direct correlation and produce an upward slope on a graph - as one variable increases so does the other, and vice versa.**Negative**coefficients represent inverse correlation and produce a downward slope on a graph - as one variable increases, the other variable tends to decrease.

For better understanding, please take a look at the following correlation graphs:

- A coefficient of
**1**means a perfect positive relationship - as one variable increases, the other increases proportionally. - A coefficient of
**-1**means a perfect negative relationship - as one variable increases, the other decreases proportionally. - A coefficient of
**0**means no relationship between two variables - the data points are scattered all over the graph.

In statistics, they measure several types of correlation depending on type of the data you are working with. In this tutorial, we will focus on the most common one.

**Pearson Correlation**, the full name is the *Pearson Product Moment Correlation *(PPMC), is used to evaluate **linear** relationships between data when a change in one variable is associated with a proportional change in the other variable. In simple terms, the Pearson Correlation answers the question: Can the data be represented on a line?

In statistics, it is the most popular correlation type, and if you are dealing with a "correlation coefficient" without further qualification, it's most likely to be the Pearson.

Here's the most commonly used formula to find the Pearson correlation coefficient, also called *Pearson's R*:

At times, you may come across two other formulas for calculating the *sample correlation coefficient* (r) and the *population correlation coefficient* (ρ).

Calculating the Pearson correlation coefficient by hand involves quite a lot of math. Luckily, Microsoft Excel has made things very simple. Depending on your data set and your goal, you are free to use one of the following techniques:

- Find the Pearson correlation coefficient with the CORREL function.
- Make a correlation matrix by performing Data Analysis.
- Find multiple correlation coefficients with a formula.
- Plot a correlation graph to get the visual representation of the data relationship.

To compute a correlation coefficient by hand, you'd have to use this lengthy formula. To find correlation coefficient in Excel, leverage the CORREL or PEARSON function and get the result in a fraction of a second.

The CORREL function returns the Pearson correlation coefficient for two sets of values. Its syntax is very easy and straightforward:

CORREL(array1, array2)

Where:

**Array1**is the first range of values.**Array2**is the second range of values.

The two arrays should have equal length.

Assuming we have a set of independent variables (*x*) in B2:B13 and dependent variables (y) in C2:C13, our correlation coefficient formula goes as follows:

`=CORREL(B2:B13, C2:C13)`

Or, we could swap the ranges and still get the same result:

`=CORREL(C2:C13, B2:B13)`

Either way, the formula shows a strong negative correlation (about -0.97) between the average monthly temperature and the number of heaters sold:

To calculate the correlation coefficient in Excel successfully, please keep in mind these 3 simple facts:

- If one or more cells in an array contains text, logical values or blanks, such cells are ignored; cells with zero values are calculated.
- If the supplied arrays are of different lengths, an #N/A error is returned.
- If either of the arrays is empty or if the standard deviation of their values equals zero, a #DIV/0! error occurs.

The PEARSON function in Excel does the same thing - calculates the Pearson Product Moment Correlation coefficient.

PEARSON(array1, array2)

Where:

**Array1**is a range of independent values.**Array2**is a range of dependent values.

Because PEARSON and CORREL both compute the Pearson linear correlation coefficient, their results should agree, and they generally do in recent versions of Excel 2007 through Excel 2019.

In Excel 2003 and earlier versions, however, the PEARSON function may display some rounding errors. Therefore, in older versions, it is recommended to use CORREL in preference to PEARSON.

On our sample data set, both functions exhibit the same results:

`=CORREL(B2:B13, C2:C13)`

`=PEARSON(B2:B13, C2:C13)`

When you need to test interrelations between more than two variables, it makes sense to construct a correlation matrix, which is sometimes called *multiple correlation coefficient*.

The **correlation matrix** is a table that shows the correlation coefficients between the variables at the intersection of the corresponding rows and columns.

The correlation matrix in Excel is built using the *Correlation* tool from the *Analysis ToolPak* add-in. This add-in is available in all versions of Excel 2003 through Excel 2019, but is not enabled by default. If you have not activated it yet, please do this now by following the steps described in How to enable Data Analysis ToolPak in Excel.

With the Data Analysis tools added to your Excel ribbon, you are prepared to run correlation analysis:

- On the top right corner of the
*Data*tab >*Analysis*group, click the**Data Analysis**button.

- In the
*Data Analysis*dialog box, select**Correlation**and click OK.

- In the
*Correlation*box, configure the parameters in this way:- Click in the
*Input Range*box and select the range with your source data, including column headers (B1:D13 in our case). - In the
*Grouped by*section, make sure the**Columns**radio box is selected (given that your source data are grouped into columns). - Select the
**Labels in first row**check box if the selected range contains column headers. - Choose the desired output option. To have the matrix in the same sheet, select
**Output Range**and specify the reference to the leftmost cell into which the matrix is to be output (A15 in this example).

- Click in the

When done, click the *OK* button:

Your matrix of correlation coefficients is done and should look something like shown in the next section.

In your Excel correlation matrix, you can find the coefficients at the intersection of rows and columns. If the column and row coordinates are the same, the value 1 is output.

In the above example, we are interested to know the correlation between the dependent variable (number of heaters sold) and two independent variables (average monthly temperature and advertising costs). So, we look only at the numbers at the intersection of these rows and columns, which are highlighted in the screenshot below:

The negative coefficient of -0.97 (rounded to 2 decimal places) shows a strong inverse correlation between the monthly temperature and heater sales - as the temperature grows higher, fewer heaters are sold.

The positive coefficient of 0.97 (rounded to 2 decimal places) indicates a strong direct connection between the advertising budget and sales - the more money you spend on advertising, the higher the sales.

Building the correlation table with the Data Analysis tool is easy. However, that matrix is static, meaning you will need to run correlation analysis anew every time the source data change.

The good news is that you can easily build a similar correlation table yourself, and that matrix will update automatically with each change in the source values.

To have it done, use this generic formula:

CORREL(OFFSET(*first_variable_range *, 0, ROWS($1:1)-1), OFFSET(*first_variable_range*, 0, COLUMNS($A:A)-1))

In our case, the first variable range is $B$2:$B$13 (please notice the $ sign that locks the reference), and our correlation formula takes this shape:

`=CORREL(OFFSET($B$2:$B$13, 0, ROWS($1:1)-1), OFFSET($B$2:$B$13, 0, COLUMNS($A:A)-1))`

With the formula ready, let's construct a correlation matrix:

- In the first row and first column of the matrix, type the variables' labels in the same order as they appear in your source table (please see the screenshot below).
- Input the above formula in the leftmost cell (B16 in our case).
- Drag the formula down and to the right to copy it to as many rows and columns as needed (3 rows and 3 columns in our example).

As the result, we've got the following matrix with multiple correlation coefficients. Please notice that the coefficients returned by our formula are exactly the same as output by Excel in the previous example (the relevant ones are highlighted):

As you already know, the Excel CORREL function returns the correlation coefficient for two sets of variables that you specify. The main challenge is to supply the appropriate ranges in the corresponding cells of the matrix. For this, you enter only the first variable range in the formula and use the following functions to make the necessary adjustments:

- OFFSET - returns a range that is a given number of rows and columns from a specified range.
- ROWS and COLUMNS - return the number of rows and columns in a range, respectively. In our correlation formula, both are used with one purpose - get the number of columns to offset from the starting range. And this is achieved by cleverly using absolute and relative references.

To better understand the logic, let's see how the formula calculates the coefficients highlighted in the screenshot above.

First, let's examine the formula in B18, which finds correlation between the monthly temperature (B2:B13) and heaters sold (D2:D13):

`=CORREL(OFFSET($B$2:$B$13, 0, ROWS($1:3)-1), OFFSET($B$2:$B$13, 0, COLUMNS($A:A)-1))`

In the first OFFSET function, ROWS($1:1) has transformed to ROWS($1:3) because the second coordinate is relative, so it changes based on the relative position of the row where the formula is copied (2 rows down). Thus, ROWS() returns 3, from which we subtract 1, and get a range that is 2 columns to the right of the source range, i.e. $D$2:$D$13 (heater sales).

The second OFFSET does not change the specified range $B$2:$B$13 (temperature) because COLUMNS($A:A)-1 returns zero.

As the result, our long formula turns into a simple CORREL($D$2:$D$13, $B$2:$B$13) and returns exactly the coefficient we want.

The formula in C18 that calculates a correlation coefficient for advertising cost (C2:C13) and sales (D2:D13) works in a similar manner:

`=CORREL(OFFSET($B$2:$B$13, 0, ROWS($1:3)-1), OFFSET($B$2:$B$13, 0, COLUMNS($A:B)-1))`

The first OFFSET function is absolutely the same as describe above, returning the range of $D$2:$D$13 (heater sales).

In the second OFFSET, COLUMNS($A:A)-1 changes to COLUMNS($A:B)-1 because we've copied the formula 1 column to the right. Consequently, OFFSET gets a range that is 1 column to the right of the source range, i.e. $C$2:$C$13 (advertising cost).

When doing correlation in Excel, the best way to get a visual representation of the relations between your data is to draw a **scatter plot** with a **trendline**. Here's how:

- Select two columns with numeric data, including column headers. The order of columns is important: the
*independent*variable should be in the left column as this column is to be plotted on the x axis; the*dependent*variable should be in the right column as it will be plotted on the y axis. - On the
*Inset*tab, in the*Chats*group, click the**Scatter**chart icon. This will immediately insert an XY scatter chart in your worksheet. - Right click any data point in the chart and choose
**Add Trendline…**from the context menu.

For the detailed step-by-step instructions, please see:

For our sample data set, the correlation graphs look like shown in the image below. Additionally, we displayed R-squared value, also called the *Coefficient of Determination*. This value indicates how well the trendline corresponds to the data - the closer R^{2} to 1, the better the fit.

From the R^{2} value displayed on your scatterplot, you can easily calculate the correlation coefficient:

- For better accuracy, get Excel to show more digits in the R-squared value than it does by default.
- Click the R
^{2}value on the chart, select it using the mouse, and press Ctrl + C to copy it. - Get a square root of R
^{2}either by using the SQRT function or by raising the copied R^{2}value to the power of 0.5.

For example, the R^{2} value in the second graph is 0.9174339392. So, you can find the correlation coefficient for *Advertising* and *Heaters sold* with one of these formulas:

`=SQRT(0.9174339392)`

`=0.9174339392^0.5`

As you can make sure, the coefficients calculated in this way are perfectly in line with the correlation coefficients found in the previous examples, **except the sign**:

The *Pearson Product Moment Correlation* only reveals a **linear** relationship between the two variables. Meaning, your variables may be strongly related in another, curvilinear, way and still have the correlation coefficient equal to or close to zero.

The Pearson correlation is not able to distinguish **dependent** and **independent** variables. For example, when using the CORREL function to find the association between an average monthly temperature and the number of heaters sold, we got a coefficient of -0.97, which indicates a high negative correlation. However, you could switch around the variables and get the same result. So, someone may conclude that higher heater sales cause temperature to fall, which obviously makes no sense. Therefore, when running correlation analysis in Excel, be aware of the data you are supplying.

Besides, the Pearson correlation is very sensitive to **outliers**. If you have one or more data points that differ greatly from the rest of the data, you may get a distorted picture of the relationship between the variables. In this case, you'd be wise to use the Spearman rank correlation instead.

That's how to do correlation in Excel. To have a closer look at the examples discussed in this tutorial, you are welcome to download our sample workbook to Calculate Correlation in Excel. I thank you for reading and hope to see you on our blog next week!

Excel formulas
CSV
Excel functions
Print
Financial functions
Vlookup
Merge data in Excel
SumIf
CountIf
Excel Compare
If statement
Excel Charts
Pivot Table
Conditional formatting
Excel formatting
Excel duplicates
Excel date
Excel tips
Excel macro
Outlook
Google Sheets
Outlook duplicates
Shared email templates

Category: Excel Tips

60+ professional tools for Excel

2019–2010 to do your daily work

2019–2010 to do your daily work

Incredible product, even better tech support…AbleBits totally delivers!

Deborah Bryant

Anyone who works with Excel is sure to find their work made easier

Jackie Lee

The best spent money on software I've ever spent!

Patrick Raugh

Ablebits is a fantastic product - easy to use and so efficient.

Debra Celmer

Excel is at its best now

Annie C.

I don't know how to thank you enough for your Excel add-ins

Jennifer Morningstar

Anybody who experiences it, is bound to love it!

Kumar Nepa

AbleBits suite has really helped me when I was in a crunch!

Nelda Fink

I have enjoyed every bit of it and time am using it

Christian Onyekachi Nwosu

It's the best $100 we've ever spent!

Mike Cavanagh

I love the program, and I can't imagine using Excel without it!

Robert Madsen

One word… WOW!

Dave Brown

Love the products!

David Johnston

It is like having an expert at my shoulder helping me…

Linda Shakespeare

Your software really helps make my job easier

Jeannie C.

Thanks for a terrific product that is worth every single cent!

Dianne Young

I love your product

Brad Gibson

Awesome!!!

Sheila Blanchard

## 10 responses to "Correlation in Excel: coefficient, matrix and graph"

can you help me move space

am so grateful...i got all i needed

This is one of the best website to learn Excel Things

thanks so much. this is a great help.

is the correlation table, parametric or non-parametric?

paerson correlation value and the correlation coeffiecient in the matrix don't give same value.why????

I get different results while working with the same data via correlation formula and multiple correlation coefficients.Please ans. why this is so?

GG ma' lady

Hi, I just want to know how I can interpret the following correlation output - you can work with Rows 1 to 7 as the others couldnt get sufficient space to be shown in the correct order.

Correlations Row 1 Row 2 Row 3 Row 4 Row 5 Row 6 Row 7 Row 8 Row 9 Row 10

Row 1 1

Row 2 0.983363824073165 1

Row 3 0.983363824073165 1 1

Row 4 0.979518632322131 0.996095520165144 0.996095520165144 1

Row 5 0.986642049796296 0.999502987676889 0.999502987676889 0.996371525478394 1

Row 6 0.979518632322131 0.996095520165144 0.996095520165144 1 0.996371525478394 1

Row 7 0.988105771238725 0.964764865097207 0.964764865097207 0.955965158440264 0.971327726687946 0.955965158440264 1

Row 8 0.979031687867817 0.995402964745251 0.995402964745251 0.998868389010018 0.996937265903419 0.998868389010018 0.961647671841555 1

Row 9 0.983589512579198 0.998502250759393 0.998502250759393 0.998960826628448 0.99894251336106 0.998960826628448 0.965574564964551 0.998920644836906 1

Row 10 0.960674890792245 0.992970295109823 0.992970295109823 0.996457658924695 0.991464275915717 0.996457658924695 0.932441806444307 0.994516942741133 0.994683723084218 1

Thanks a lot! This is just wonderful.