*The tutorial explains the basics of Spearman correlation in a simple language and shows how to calculate the Spearman rank correlation coefficient in Excel.*

When doing correlation analysis in Excel, in most cases you will deal with the Pearson correlation. But because the Pearson correlation coefficient measures only a linear relationship between two variables, it does not work for all data types - your variables may be strongly associated in a non-linear way and still have the coefficient close to zero. In such circumstances, you can do the Spearman rank correlation instead of Pearson's.

The **Spearman correlation** is the nonparametric version of the Pearson correlation coefficient that measure the degree of association between two variables based on their ranks.

The *Pearson Product Moment Correlation* tests the **linear** relationship between two continuous variables. Linear means a relationship when two variables change in the same direction at a constant rate.

*Spearman Rank Correlation* evaluates the **monotonic** relationship between the ranked values. In a monotonic relationship, the variables also tend to change together, but not necessarily at a constant rate.

The Spearman correlation analysis is to be used in any of the following circumstances when the underlying assumptions of the Pearson correlation are not met:

- If your data exhibit a
**non-linear**relationship or are not normally distributed. - If at least one variable is
**ordinal**. If your values can be placed in "first, second, third…" order, you are dealing with ordinal data. - If there are significant
**outliers**. Unlike the Pearson correlation, the Spearman correlation is not sensitive to outliers because it performs calculations on the ranks, so the difference between actual values does not have meaning.

For example, you can use the Spearman correlation to find the answers to the following questions:

- Are people with a higher level of education more concerned about the environment?
- Is the number of symptoms a patient has related to their willingness to take medication?

In statistics, the **Spearman correlation coefficient** is represented by either *r _{s}* or the Greek letter

The Spearman rank correlation coefficient measures both the strength and direction of the relationship between the ranks of data. It can be any value from -1 to 1, and the closer the absolute value of the coefficient to 1, the stronger the relationship:

- 1 is a perfect positive correlation
- -1 is a perfect negative correlation
- 0 is no correlation

Depending on whether there are or there are no ties in the ranking (the same rank assigned to two or more observations), the Spearman correlation coefficient can be calculated with one of the following formulas.

If there are **no tied ranks**, a simpler formula will do:

Where:

*d*is the difference between a pair of ranks_{i}*n*is the number of observations

To deal with **tied ranks**, the full version of Spearman correlation formula has to be used, which is a slightly modified version of Pearson's r:

Where:

- R(x) and R(y) are the ranks of the
*x*and*y*variables - R(x) and R(y) are the mean ranks

Regrettably, Excel does not have an inbuilt function for calculating the Spearman rank correlation coefficient. However, that does not mean you will have to rack your brain with the above formulas. By manipulating Excel a bit, we can come up with a much simpler way to do Spearman correlation.

As an example, let's try to find out if our physical activity has any relation to our blood pressure. In column B, we have the number of minutes that 10 men of the same age spend daily in a gym, and in column C, we have their systolic blood pressure.

To find the Spearman correlation coefficient in Excel, perform these steps:

**Rank your data**Because the Spearman correlation evaluates the associations between two variables based on their ranks, you need to rank your source data. This can be quickly done by using the Excel RANK.AVG function.

To rank the first variable (physical activity), enter the below formula in D2 and then drag it down to D11:

`=RANK.AVG(B2,$B$2:$B$11,0)`

To rank the second variable (blood pressure), put the following formula in cell E2 and copy it down the column:

`=RANK.AVG(C2,$C$2:$C$11,0)`

For the formulas to work correctly, please be sure to lock the ranges with absolute cell references.

At this point, your source data should look similar to this:

**Find Spearman correlation coefficient**

With the ranks established, we can now use the Excel CORREL function to get Spearman's rho:`=CORREL(D2:D11, E2:E11)`

The formula returns a coefficient of -0.7576 (rounded to 4 digits), which shows a fairly strong negative correlation and allows us to conclude that the more a person exercises, the lower their blood pressure.

The Pearson correlation coefficient for the same sample (-0.7445) indicates a bit weaker correlation, but still statistically significant:

The beauty of this method is that it is quick, easy, and works regardless of whether there are ties in the ranking or not.

If you are not quite sure that the CORREL function has computed Spearman's rho right, you can verify the result with the traditional formula used in statistics. Here's how:

- Find the difference between each pair of ranks (
**d**) by subtracting one rank from the other:`=D2-E2`

This formula goes to F2 and is then copied down the column.

- Raise each rank difference to the power of two (
**d**):^{2}

`=F2^2`

This formula goes to column G.

- Add up the squared differences:
`=SUM(G2:G11)`

This formula can go to any blank cell, G12 in our case.

From the following screenshot, you will probably gain better understanding of the data arrangement:

- Depending on whether your data set has any tied ranks or not, use one of these formulas to calculate the Spearman correlation coefficient.

In our example, there are no ties, so we can go with a simpler formula:

With *d ^{2}* equal to 290, and

As the result, you get -0.757575758, which perfectly agrees with the Spearman correlation coefficient calculated in the previous example.

In Microsoft Excel, the above calculations can be performed with the following equation:

`=1-(6*G12/(10*(10^2-1)))`

Where G12 is the sum of the squared rank differences (d^{2}).

The correlation coefficients in Excel only measure linear (Pearson) or monotonic (Spearman) relationships. However, other associations are possible. So, no matter which correlation you do, it is always a good idea to represent the relationship between the variables in a graph.

To draw a correlation graph for the ranked data, here's what you need to do:

- Calculate the ranks by using the RANK.AVG function as explained in this example.
- Select two columns with the ranks.
- Insert an XY scatter chart. For this, click the
*Scatter**chart*icon on the*Inset*tab, in the*Chats*group. - Add a trendline to your chart. The fastest way is to click the
*Chart Elements*button >*Add Trendline…*. - Display R-squared value on the chart. Double-click the trendline to open its pane, switch to the
*Trendline Options*tab and select the*Display R-squared value**on chart*box. - Show more digits in the R
^{2}value for better accuracy.

As the result, you will get a visual representation of the relationship between the ranks. Additionally, you will get the *Coefficient of Determination* (R^{2}), the square root of which is the Pearson correlation coefficient (r). But because you have plotted the ranked data, this Pearson's r is nothing else but Spearman's rho.

In our case, R^{2} equals 0.5739210285. Use the SQRT function to find the square root:

`=SQRT(0.5739210285)`

…and you will get the already familiar coefficient of 0.757575758.

The downward slope in the graph exhibits a negative correlation, so we add the minus sign and get the correct Spearman correlation coefficient of -0.757575758.

That's how you can calculate the Spearman rank correlation coefficient in Excel. To have a closer look at the examples discussed in this tutorial, you are welcome to download our sample workbook to Spearman Rank Correlation in Excel. I thank you for reading and hope to see you on our blog next week!

Excel formulas
CSV
Excel functions
Print
Financial functions
Vlookup
Merge data in Excel
SumIf
CountIf
Excel Compare
If statement
Excel Charts
Pivot Table
Conditional formatting
Excel formatting
Excel duplicates
Excel date
Excel tips
Excel macro
Outlook
Google Sheets
Outlook duplicates
Shared email templates

Category: Excel Tips

60+ professional tools for Excel

2019–2010 to do your daily work

2019–2010 to do your daily work

Incredible product, even better tech support…AbleBits totally delivers!

Deborah Bryant

Anyone who works with Excel is sure to find their work made easier

Jackie Lee

The best spent money on software I've ever spent!

Patrick Raugh

Ablebits is a fantastic product - easy to use and so efficient.

Debra Celmer

Excel is at its best now

Annie C.

I don't know how to thank you enough for your Excel add-ins

Jennifer Morningstar

Anybody who experiences it, is bound to love it!

Kumar Nepa

AbleBits suite has really helped me when I was in a crunch!

Nelda Fink

I have enjoyed every bit of it and time am using it

Christian Onyekachi Nwosu

It's the best $100 we've ever spent!

Mike Cavanagh

I love the program, and I can't imagine using Excel without it!

Robert Madsen

One word… WOW!

Dave Brown

Love the products!

David Johnston

It is like having an expert at my shoulder helping me…

Linda Shakespeare

Your software really helps make my job easier

Jeannie C.

Thanks for a terrific product that is worth every single cent!

Dianne Young

I love your product

Brad Gibson

Awesome!!!

Sheila Blanchard

## 13 responses to "How to do Spearman correlation in Excel"

Excellent example

tHANK YOU, mISTER, I AM VERII GREJTFL

What if we have NA in the data, can we ignore NA and perform the sperman's correlation in excel

There is an error in the first table with 4 columns: the first row of data is different from all other tables and gives erroneous ranking. This is just above the section called '2. Find Spearman correlation coefficient'

Hi Jeremy,

Good catch, thank you! The erroneous screenshot is replaced with the right one.

When you say "you can use the Pearson correlation to find the answers to the following questions"...did you actually mean the Spearman correlation?

Hi Vinny,

Absolutely so :) Fixed, thank you!

Thank you very much for the explanation!!

awesome!

Can you give examples if the data were to have tied ranks???

great example

great explanation.

Thank you

Thank you for this example, it's really helpful!

I was just wondering, if one or both variables were already ordinal and not continuous, could you still do a Spearman correlation using the CORREL function as you have outlined? I'm unsure because I don't know if you would carry out the RANK.AVG function on the data if it is already ranked. Any help would be much appreciated.

Hi, excellent examples, thank you. just one thing - you indicate a different formula is necessary if there are tied ranks (as I have in my data) but the formula is not presented. Any chance you could add this one? Thanks a lot.